
About a year or so ago, I read Paul Merriman and Richard Buck's book, We're Talking Millions: 12 Simple Ways to Supercharge Your Retirement. In terms of a book review, you could do much worse than this one as an introduction to getting started with investing the right way. But in this post, I want to specifically look at the main thesis of the book: the two funds for life portfolio.
Why?
Well, because this strategy actually forms the foundation of my investing plan detailed here.
• Locumstory is the simplest explainer I’ve seen for locums. What it is, how it started, and what it looks like in your specialty.
• Take the “Are you ready for locums?” quiz, compare agencies, and run through their free crash course.
• If you want the truth, not the hype: pay ranges, taxes, multi-state headaches, and real physician stories.
Bringing you up to speed
The book itself is really good and walks the reader through the most important steps of investing and securing your nest egg. It is always immensely readable and took me about 4 days to get through.
The first portion of the book reviews things like saving, why active investing in the stock market doesn't work, and why index funds are the way to go.

Me three to four years ago needed to understand those concepts. Now, I have them basically automated. For anyone looking for a quick refresher on those topics, here are some great posts:
- Stress Free Stock Market Investing Is Easier Than It Seems!
- How To Buy Index Funds For Beginners
- Crash Proof Retirement for Doctors
However, again the focus here is what is covered largely in the second half of this book. That is where Merriman and Buck propose their preferred investment portfolio: the two funds for life portfolio.
What is the two funds for life investment portfolio?
The two funds for life portfolio is their set it and forget it index fund based investment recommendation for basically all investors.
I realize as I type this that it almost sounds like I'm being smug. Like I'm suggesting such simplicity is naivety. But I promise I'm not! Remember, I'm all about keeping it simple stupid (me).
Anyway, the two funds in this portfolio are:
- A Target date index fund based on your goal age of retirement and
- A small value index fund
That's it.
Before getting deeper into analysis, let's review each of these funds in turn.
Target date funds
First and most importantly, not all target date funds are based on low cost broadly diversified index funds. Some are actively managed. You want ones based on index funds.
With that out of the way, target date funds are a fund composed on other funds. Some stock index funds, some bond index funds. You pick the exact target date fund based on the year (approximately) that you expect to retire or reach FI. The target date fund starts off more aggressively early with a higher percentage allocation in stocks compared to bonds. Then, as you approach your target date, it becomes more and more conservative with a higher percentage of bond funds.
In general, target date funds aren't perfect because nothing is, but they are a great option.
Small value index funds
Companies are arbitrarily divided in two broad ways, based on size and based on stock price to earnings ratio.
Put simply, stocks of big companies are considered large cap(italization). Stocks of small companies are small cap.
Stocks of companies with a higher stock price to earnings (P/E) ratio are called growth stocks. These tend to be stocks of established companies where the value of a stock share price seems equated or inflated compared to the earnings of the company.
In contrast, value stocks are those of companies with a lower P/E ratio. These are stocks that may be undervalued and have a lot of room to rise.
Over the long term, small cap stocks and value stocks historically outperform large cap and growth stocks. And a small value index fund is an index fund with small value company stocks.
Why do Merriman and Buck recommend this portfolio?
• Most side gigs take time to build. This one pays fast.
• I do short, physician-only surveys on Sermo between cases and get paid for my input.
• They take just a few minutes and the money hits PayPal or gift cards right away.
• It’s not replacing my OR income, but it covers the little things that have a big impact—gifts, kids' activities, or the next date night.
Well, investing in an asset allocation of stocks and bonds based on your risk tolerance that progressively becomes more conservative (bond heavy) as you approach retirement is how I recommend to invest. It's how I invest my money.
And a target date fund does just this for you in exchange for a *slightly* higher expense ratio. That is a worthwhile trade for many, maybe the majority, of investors who just don't want to reset their asset allocation over time.
However, Merriman and Buck argue that a target date fund alone is not enough
Well, maybe that is a bit harsh. If you just want to do a target date fund alone, that's fine in my and their book. It's what they recommended for a long time.
But, the two funds for life portfolio calls for being a bit more aggressive. It calls for taking advantage of the fact that small value stocks outperform the market average historically. Thus, by adding a small value index fund (not trying to actively pick or time the market with small value stocks!), you can take advantage of this trend to increase your returns.
Especially at the beginning of your investment career when you can tolerate more risk and are looking for more growth.
And what percentage of each fund should you have? Obviously this is where you can personalize based on your risk tolerance. But I think 90% target date fund and 10% small value index fund is a good starting point.
Examples of a two funds for life portfolio
Here are some examples. I'll use a target date fund with 2045 as the target date for illustration purposes.
Vanguard
- Vanguard Target Retirement 2045 Fund (VTIVX)
- Vanguard Small Cap Value Index Fund (VSIAX)
Fidelity
- Fidelity Freedom® 2045 Fund (FFFGX)
- Fidelity® Small Cap Value Index Fund (VISFX)
Would I invest in the portfolio?
Yeah. I would. In fact, I do.
I really love the simplicity of this investing strategy. If you look at my 403b investment portfolio, I basically am investing like this. Except I am doing it in a DIY fashion. Because I'm a nerd.
In 2024, Selenid and I opened a taxable investment account and started contributing every month to it. We are at that bucket in our investment account waterfall. And in this growing taxable account with Vanguard, we put it in the two funds for life portfolio you see above.
It keeps us right at our desired asset allocation and aligns perfectly with our written investment plan. But is even more hands off. Win-win.
Should doctors invest in the two fund for life portfolio?
Yes! No surprise there. If I invest in it, surely I really believe in it and think it would do well for other doctors!
This is an especially great strategy for physicians who don't want even a slightly active hand in their investments. It is low cost, well-diversified, and built for early growth with a progressive dialing down of risk.
What's not to like?!
You can even personalize your risk tolerance. For instance, if you are more risk tolerant, you can choose a target date fund with a target date beyond your expected FIRE date. Thus, you invest more heavily in stocks for longer. If you are more conservative, just choose a fund with a date sooner than your actual target date.
If you are one of the many high income earning physicians with a massive savings account because you haven't pulled the investment trigger, the two funds for life strategy may be just right for you!
Also, if you find yourself in that boat, I wrote this post just for you: Help! I’m a High Income Earner But Scared to Invest
What do you think? Have you heard of the two funds for life portfolio? Would you invest in it? Why or why not? Let me know in the comments below!
• Most side gigs take time to build. This one pays fast.
• I do short, physician-only surveys on Sermo between cases and get paid for my input.
• They take just a few minutes and the money hits PayPal or gift cards right away.
• It’s not replacing my OR income, but it covers the little things that have a big impact—gifts, kids' activities, or the next date night.

4 Responses
Holy smokes, Jordan! “Over the long term, small cap stocks and value stocks historically outperform large cap and growth stocks.” Where’s your data to support that statement? Even doctors know how to run the numbers on asset class historical performance. Please show me your data, I’d like to simplify my portfolio.
There;’s a lot of good historical data…https://www.dimensional.com/ca-en/insights/when-its-value-versus-growth-history-is-on-values-side#:~:text=on%20Value's%20Side-,When%20It's%20Value%20vs.,1927%2C%20as%20Exhibit%201%20shows.
Hey dude great article as always Jordan, although you might have meant the book “2 Funds for Life” by the great Paul Merriman and Chris Pederson, and not Paul Merriman and Rich Buck’s book, “We’re Talking Millions: 12 Simple Ways to Supercharge Your Retirement.”
I think it would be tough to keep the your chosen asset allocation consistent across accounts given not all accounts would have a good small cap value index fund, nor would I recommend target date funds in taxable given the unexpected tax bomb like from the Vanguard TDF debacle a few years ago. Do you find you have to compromise on the 2 Funds for life strategy given these limitations? and if so how? If your retirement account only had a 90bps small cap value actively managed fund, would you ditch it knowing this fund would underperform the index because of fees and just go with and S&P500 index? or do you bite the bullet to keep your asset allocation and go for the actively managed fund know that the expensive ratio is screwing you out of money as likely it won’t even outperform a total US index as the small value premium is wiped out by the fees? Also, do you still have a TDF in taxable despite the problems Vangaurd TDF’s had a few year ago?
Hey Rikki, I keep the 2 funds for life in all my accounts including taxable. The Vanguard issue was a bit of a fluke in that they lowered their minimums and many institutional investors changed funds to the lower one. Rather than anything inherent about the TDFs themselves. And yeah I would sacrifice an expensive small value fund if I didn’t have a low ER option available.